The Grey Chronicles

2009.May.7

How Big is My Footprint?



Ecological Footprint Atlas 2008Although, the Global Footprint Network released its 2008 Ecological Footprint Atlas last October, I only become aware of it recently while researching for my Relative Hardship posts. I had been wanting to expound on that report, but other pressing posts overwhelmed my effort to finish the exposition.

The authors premised their report (2008):

“Competition for ecological services will play a critical role in the 21st century. If we continue business-as-usual, peak energy and climate change will combine with food shortages, biodiversity loss, depleted fisheries, soil erosion and freshwater stress to create a global supply-demand crunch of essential resources. Humanity is already in “overshoot,” using more resources than Earth can renew.”

Although the Ecological Footprint concept was created by Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees at the University of British Columbia in the early 1990’s, it was only in 2003 when the Global Footprint Network was established to address a need for a metric to sway the ideological debates over the “affordability of sustainability”.

The Ecological Footprint calculates the combined demand for ecological resources wherever they are located and presents them as the global average area needed to support a specific human activity. The method is limited in three ways: Some aspects of sustainability are excluded from its scope; some aspects of demand are hard to quantify; and like any method, errors can occur in the implementation. On the individual level, however, the question is simply: How much land area does it take to support your lifestyle?

Below is a snapshot for Asia Pacific, taken from Table 1: Per-Person Ecological Footprint of Production, Imports, Exports, and Consumption, by Country, 2005. pp. 41-43.

Asia-Pacific Ecological Footprint

Asia-Pacific Ecological Footprint

Biocapacity is an aggregated measure of the amount of land available, weighted by the productivity of that land. It represents the ability of the biosphere to produce crops, livestock (pasture), timber products (forest) and fish, as well as to sequester waste such as CO2. In 2005, this amounted to 2.1 global hectares [gha] per person.

The production Footprint is the sum of the Footprints for all the resources harvested and all of the waste generated within the defined geographical region. This includes all the area within a country necessary for supporting the actual harvest of primary products (cropland, pasture land, forestland and fishing grounds), the country’s built-up area (roads, factories, cities), and the area needed to absorb all fossil fuel carbon emissions generated within the country.

The consumption Footprint (in gha) includes the area needed to produce the materials consumed and the area needed to absorb the waste. This includes their household consumption as well as their collective consumption, such as schools, roads, fire brigades, etc., which serve the household, but may not be directly paid for by the households.

At a glance, one might assume that some countries consume more than they produce, but the difference between the production and the consumption Footprint is, simply, trade. Thus:

Ecological Footprint of consumption = Ecological Footprint of Production + Ecological Footprint of Imports – Ecological Footprint of Exports

An ecological deficit occurs when the Footprint of a population exceeds the biocapacity of the area available to that population. Conversely, an ecological reserve exists when the biocapacity of a region or country exceeds the Footprint of its population.

For more information on calculation and methodology, kindly refer to Calculation Methodology for the National Footprint Accounts, 2008 Edition and Guidebook to the 2008 National Footprint Accounts.

The report issued a challenge:

“The political challenge is to demonstrate that this is not an “inconvenient truth” to be resisted, but rather a critical issue that demands bold action in the direct self interest of nations. It is a case of pure economics: Prosperity and well-being will not be possible without preserving access to the basic ecological resources and services that sustain our economy, and all of life.”

“In fact, if we reverse population trends, fasttrack resource efficiency measures, sufficiently reduce consumption and better manage our ecological assets to increase yields, then demand will no longer exceed supply. If we end overshoot, resource constraints by definition disappear.”


Notes:

Ewing B., S. Goldfinger, M. Wackernagel, M. Stechbart, S. M. Rizk, A. Reed and J. Kitzes (2008). The Ecological Footprint Atlas 2008, Oakland: Global Footprint Network, 28 October 2008, revised 16 December 2008. 87pp. back to text

Disclaimer: The posts on this site does not necessarily represent any organization’s positions, strategies or opinions; and unless otherwise expressly stated, are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Philippines License.

Advertisements

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: